What Did Your Doctor Know and When Did He Know It

(0:03) Hi, this is Dr. Daniels, and welcome to Healing with Dr. Daniels. Bird just hit my window. Well, this is Sunday, September 8th, 2019, and today's topic is what did your doctor know, and when did he know it? We're talking about breast cancer and hormone replacement therapy as a serious agent in increasing the incidence of breast cancer.

(0:35) Of course, as usual, today's topic was prompted by a missive, that means a piece of information from the medical industrial complex itself. And what they've said is it is confirmed. Menopausal hormone therapy and breast cancer link confirmed. That suggests that there is no doubt about it. Now, this of course was 2019, and this came out about a week ago.

(1:14) Now, I've been hearing rumors about this really since I entered medical school in 1979. People would say, well, you know, those birth control pills cause breast cancer. Well, you know, that hormone replacement therapy causes cancer. It's not safe. And of course, as a diligent medical student, I was waiting for my professors to tell me the truth. And so here it is in 2019. But there are many hints and a lot of information prior to that. So let's take a look at that. Let's also take a look at data and correlation between information availability and incidence of breast cancer and even death from breast cancer.

(2:02) So here we go. So short-term use of hormone replacement therapy was associated with a lower risk and even no risk if used for less than a year. So the big deal here is that, why use it at all, of course. So all types of menopausal hormone therapy, all types, with the exception of vaginally inserted estrogen, are associated with an increased risk of developing breast cancer, concludes a large meta-analysis.

(2:50) Even after hormone replacement therapy was stopped, some excess risk of breast cancer could persist for a decade, that's 10 years, with the size of risk dependent on the duration of use. This is sounding a lot like smoking cigarettes. Now, use of menopausal hormone therapy for 10 years results in about twice the excess breast cancer risk associated with five years of use. So it's dose-related and time-related.

(3:20) But there appears to be little risk from the use of menopausal hormone therapy for less than a year or from topical use of vaginal estrogens that are applied locally as creams or pessaries and not intended to reach the bloodstream. Now, originally, hormone replacement therapy was promoted as life-saving therapy to prevent bone fractures. It's clear that taking hormone replacement therapy for a year is not going to prevent bone cancers. It's just, you know, doesn't work that way.

(3:57) The risk was somewhat attenuated among a small number of women who had started therapy after the age of 60 and by weight. Get this, listen carefully. Obese women, women who are more than 30% overweight, had a lower risk of breast cancer with hormone replacement therapy use as compared with those who are lean or just a little overweight, the team reports. Now, this is totally at odds with the statistics saying that being overweight is actually a risk for increased breast cancer.

(4:34) This is very, very interesting because who is more likely to go to the doctor every year to get their hormone replacement therapy prescription and take it as directed? The same lady who goes to the gym and tries to get lean, exactly. So these women who are trying to do what they're taught is healthy are actually destroying their health and creating more problems for themselves. So the risk of breast cancer was higher for products containing estrogen and progesterone combinations as opposed to those that were estrogen only, especially if progesterone was given daily as opposed to intermittently.

(5:11) Now, this is an important piece of information because I was taught in medical school that you had to give progesterone with estrogen. You absolutely had to. You should never, never, never give unopposed estrogen. What's that? That means estrogen without progesterone. Fortunately, I was not convinced in medical school of any benefit to this hormone replacement therapy because I didn't see any patients doing well with it. And so when I entered medical practice, I just told the ladies, Hey, look, you know, it doesn't sound like a good idea to me. And I think you should skip it.

(5:54) So the researchers estimate if this association is largely causal, in other words, that the hormone replacement causes the cancer, then the use of menopausal hormone therapy in Western nations, read United States and English-speaking countries, has already led to about 1 million cases of breast cancer out of a total of 20 million. So easily 4% of all breast cancer cases were caused by hormone replacement therapy, but it gets even better.

(6:31) So five years of hormone replacement therapy use beginning at age 50 would increase the incidence of breast cancer by one additional case every 50 users of estrogen plus daily progesterone. And this is a way that your doctor, certainly I was taught in medical school, this is a way to do it. And so that's 2% of all women in this category. By one additional case every 70 users, if you use estrogen and intermittent progesterone, and by one additional case, every 200 users, if you use estrogen alone, this is curious because basically the way doctors were taught to prescribe this from 1979 to 83 made the drug actually four times as deadly. So in other words, it created cancer in one in 50 because the estrogen and progesterone were combined instead of one in every 200 users.

(7:33) And so the study was published online today in the Lancet, not a week ago. So this new study confirms the finding, listen for it, of an association between menopausal hormone therapy and breast cancer reported in a previous meta-analysis in 1997. Yep. How about that? So reasonably, your doctor, a doctor could have known in 1997 that there was a problem with hormone replacement therapy and that it was associated with increased breast cancer.

(8:23) Now, in my medical practice, I basically talked ladies out of it. And one thing, which of course I'm very concerned about, is many people look at medical care, healthcare, and drug taking as a reflection of their social status and their social importance. And so the research studies about osteoporosis and hormone replacement therapy are very clear that African American women do not benefit, do not benefit from hormone replacement therapy in terms of osteoporosis. And basically it's because Black women had such strong bones to begin with that they weren't getting bone fractures.

(9:08) So when I was in medical practice in the 90s, one of my patients, an African American woman, said, I want hormone replacement therapy. I said, well, you know, all the research shows that you're not going to benefit from it. She says, that's racist research, and I want to have the same medicines that white ladies have. And so what happens, in this case, it was a racial thing, but what happens is people want to take a drug, want to have a diagnosis because of the perceived increased social status of having that diagnosis or that medication. And this has really been, this is a very damaging thing.

(9:47) So this study also adds new information to that study on the duration of the risk and how the risk varies with different types of products. So a PhD from Toronto, Canada, notes that it is important to accurately estimate the increased risk of breast cancer from menopausal hormone therapy, which is also known as hormone replacement therapy. So clinicians, that means doctors or nurse practitioners, must heed the message of this study but also take a rational and comprehensive approach to the management of menopausal symptoms. As if the only way to manage menopausal symptoms is hormone replacement therapy, and as if that's the most effective way to manage it. Really?

(10:45) So in my experience as a physician and natural healing, the medications as a way of managing menopausal symptoms are not the best way or the most effective way. The most effective way to manage hot flashes, let's say, is to change the diet and to do daily enemas. And that way, the impurities in the system that would have been removed during the monthly bleeding are now removed with the enema and then are not being put in because of the dietary change.

(11:16) So they're suggesting here to the hapless doctor that the only way to manage menopausal symptoms is with these deadly drugs that cause breast cancer. So with careful consideration of the risks and benefits of initiating menopausal hormone therapy for each woman she writes. So in other words, now you have to carefully consider it on a case-by-case basis. Now your poor doctor reading this, this is written to your doctor, is confused. Does he have to justify giving the drug or justify not giving the drug? Which option has the least amount of paperwork? It is not clear from this.

(11:51) So the take-home message is that the large comprehensive study has demonstrated that menopausal hormone therapy is indeed a risk factor for breast cancer. Importantly, the risks were higher for women who used combined therapy versus estrogen alone and with increasing duration of use. So given the consistency of the evidence and the dose response that was reported, she emphasized the importance of clinicians and patients having serious frank discussions about the risks and benefits associated with the initiation of menopausal hormone therapy use.

(12:30) Now this is really important. Since the evidence is consistent and is a dose response relationship, in other words, the more hormone replacement that's given, the higher the duration, the greater the breast cancer risk. And so if you received as a patient or prescribed as a doctor, estrogen alone, the risk of breast cancer dissipated within five years of stopping. So in other words, for the first five years after stopping the drug, the breast cancer risk is elevated, but after five years, the risk drops to the regular population.

(13:00) So what they did is they reviewed 58 studies, a total of 108,000 post-menopausal women who developed breast cancer at an average age of 65 years. Half these women had used menopausal hormone therapy. Now these cases were cases that were selected, so this is not a total population amount. So the amount of people in the population who have breast cancer and used hormones or had breast cancer and didn't use hormones is not really known. But in this particular case, it was 50%.

(14:07) So women who are current users who are using the hormone therapy when they were diagnosed with breast cancer have been taking the products for an average of 10 years, while past users have been taking the products for an average of seven years. So it seems then that once you've taken the product for seven years, they say the die is cast. But if you take it for 10 years, you're likely to actually develop cancer while you're taking it.

(14:36) The team calculated that for women of average weight who had never used hormone therapy, the average risk of developing breast cancer from age 50 to 69 was about six per hundred. Now the population risk in the United States of developing breast cancer lifetime risk is about 12%. The reason it's lower is they're only looking at a 20-year interval from 50 to 70, so 6.3 per hundred women.

(15:10) So authors estimate the five-year use of hormone therapy products beginning at age 50 would increase the 20-year risk from 6.3 to 8.3 for an absolute increase of 2 per hundred women, which is the same as 1 per 50. And this is a relative risk of 1.31 or 31%, so 31% higher risk of getting breast cancer just because the person took hormone replacement therapy. And that's if they took the progesterone and the estrogen every day as a pill, which again is the way doctors were taught to prescribe it between 1979 to 83, and even after.

(15:54) So for hormone replacement products containing estrogen plus intermittent progesterone, the increase would be less, an absolute increase of only 1.4. And that basically amounts to having the lady take birth control pills, which staggers the estrogen and progesterone.

(16:22) So there's really only about two benefits, or really three. The control of symptoms, which we said can be easily handled with a dietary change, um, protection of bones, that's interesting. So why do Black women have such heavy bones? It's not because of hormones, because they're not taking any. It's not recommended, it's not effective. Turns out it's the ham hocks and collard greens. The boron in the collard greens and the gelatin in the ham hocks. Now, ham hocks are basically the knee and the elbow of the pig.

(17:14) And so there's a tremendous amount of collagen there, a tremendous amount of tendons, and of course there's the bones themselves. And in African American families in the 50s and 60s, and a little into the 70s, the tradition was to cook this dish and you would simmer it for a very long time. And the way it worked is the man of the house, who generally had a physical job, a laborer, got the meat, the kids got the fat, and the lady of the house got the broth.

(17:50) Right or wrong, that's the way it shook out. And what this meant then was the woman was actually drinking the most powerful, nutritious, and bone-building part of the dish. So generally, when dinner was served, you'd serve the man of the house first because he needed physical energy to get to work. And then what was left over, the kids would eat, and then the mother would eat the broth. And the kids usually ate more of the greens, and if they got some of the fat, then they were pretty fortunate. And so, believe it or not, that's the way it worked in my house in the 70s. And everyone thought it was just fine, no one saw anything wrong with it.

(18:42) So protection of bones, just boil up some ham hocks and collard greens, it's pretty simple to do. And decrease in cardiovascular risk, this has since been the subject of tremendous amount of research, which has shown that hormone replacement therapy actually increases cardiac risk. Now, you can believe what you want, either the studies have shown increases, or the study shows it decreases risk. But just to say there is no clear indication of benefit for taking hormone replacement in terms of heart health.

(19:00) And so, this doctor who would like to prescribe hormone replacement therapy says, to put risk into context, a woman has a greater risk of developing breast cancer if she's overweight or obese, compared to taking hormone replacement therapy. She said. Now, most women, you know, she's already 50, 100 pounds overweight, she can't change that in a blink, but she can change whether or not she's taking the hormone replacement therapy pill, that's an easily modifiable factor. And again, the present study shows that being obese is actually protective. One must be aware of the effect of obesity and alcohol, which increase the risk of breast cancer and modifies the additional risk of hormone replacement therapy.

(20:03) And again, why add hormone replacement therapy to this woman's other risk factors? That is totally unconscionable. It's terrible.

(20:25) And so, another doctor, chair of the British Menopause Society, said, we welcome this further data on the incidence of breast cancer, which will help us counsel our patients and women in general better. This paper provides further data and includes some new information on different types of progestin that surprisingly were found to not vary as much as had been thought. And he goes on to say, women must be informed of the data on breast cancer risk with hormone replacement therapy to help them make an informed decision, he continued.

(21:19) However, this should be considered in comparison to the risk of breast cancer with other lifestyle factors, such as alcohol intake and obesity, which have been shown to be associated with a higher risk compared to that with hormone replacement therapy. Again, looking at what the lady can control. If she's an alcoholic, she can't really control that real quick, and she can't really control her weight. But why add the risk of hormone replacement therapy to that, the already existing risk?

(21:58) And so, they go on to say, this should be taken to the context of the overall benefits obtained from using hormone replacement therapy, including symptom control, again, hot flashes we said could be easily controlled by diet and enema, I've never had a failure yet, and improving quality of life, as well as considering the bone and cardiovascular benefits associated with hormone replacement therapy use. And again, none of these areas is hormone replacement therapy, the only option or even the superior option.

(22:25) So very, very clear. So as early as 1997, doctors were alerted to this. So as early as 2002, it became a big news item. So let's take a look and see. If we go to cancer.org, this is an amazing site, lots of really good information. Mostly in terms of graph, you can read what you want, propaganda is, well, propaganda. So if we take a look at female breast cancer in the United States, what we find is that invasive breast cancer in 1980, we'll say 1978, started increasing, and increasing, and increasing. It peaked in about 1987, took a little dip, and then started relentlessly increasing, increasing, increasing, until 1999, which would be about, that's about right between doctors and women getting the message about the dangers of hormone replacement therapy.

(23:26) Let's say they heard the news in 1997. In 1999, the breast cancer, invasive breast cancer, dropped 15%. Just dropped. From 2000 up to 2002, about. And then it kind of leveled off, and then when Obamacare kicked in, everything was paid for, it'd be 2008, we saw an uptick in the cancer. Again, we can take a look at that as an uptick in availability of medical care. But it goes even further than that. So this is the diagnosis of breast cancer. But wait, there's something else which is absolutely fascinating. If you look at the size of breast cancer, how big was the lump when it was found? Then what you see is from 1998 to say 2002, the size of the lumps, the amount of lumps that were say two centimeters, call it an inch, an inch to two inches, would decline, and then it increased steadily, steadily, steadily.

(24:19) So now most, I won't say most, but more cancers, more breast cancers are being diagnosed when the lump is between two centimeters and five centimeters. So that's between one and two inches or even more. So you would think that if the lumps being found are getting bigger, then the death rate from breast cancer would be increasing. The other thing is the amount of lumps that are less than two centimeters, call it small, is declining. But wait, what are we seeing? The death rates from breast cancer are falling tremendously. So we're having less early diagnosis and more women are surviving breast cancer or not getting it in the first place. Why is that?

(25:03) Well, what that would reflect is those earlier cases that would have been, that were being diagnosed, were being, were receiving care, call it chemo, radiation, surgery, whatever, and that that care was actually what was deadly. So because the incidence or rate of large tumors being diagnosed is increasing, but the death rate is decreasing and the early detection of smaller tumors is decreasing, then it's the treatment of these smaller tumors that was causing the high cancer death rate in the past. Very, very interesting. Obviously, these are just my interpretations. You can look at the graphs, draw your own conclusions.

(26:01) Now, the amazing thing about this is that one, your doctor should have, could have known in 1997 that the breast cancer incidence with hormone replacement therapy was increasing, but still, it continues to be prescribed. Now, another piece of information is the other risk factors in terms of what is it that can give you risk for breast cancer. And then taking a look at what's coming from your doctor. So 33% increase in risk if you take hormone replacement therapy, and a 20% increase in risk if you take birth control pills, and a whopping 50% increase in risk if you have your first baby after age 30. So basically, what we're looking at is literally half.

(27:13) You can cut your breast cancer risk in half just by refusing birth control, refusing hormone replacement therapy, and having your first baby as a teenager. And so this whole program to eradicate teenage pregnancy has contributed to a higher rate of breast cancer. And again, when these things are discussed with women, you know, you should say to any 12, 15-year-old girl, would you rather have a baby at 18 or 19 or take chemo at 65 or 55, chemo, radiation, and surgery? And you can always give that first baby up for adoption. The grandparents who are still pretty young can pitch in and help raise the baby.

(28:00) A lot of options rather than those same would-be grandparents having no grandkids and nursing their 50-year-old daughter through her breast cancer. I would suggest it's much easier to nurse a grandchild through the first year of life than to nurse an adult child through breast cancer. But that's a personal decision should be presented as such. That's really the alternative. And same with taking birth control, again, another 20% risk. Taking hormone replacement, a 31% risk. So all of these things, all these risks are easily controlled, far easier to control, say, than a person's weight.

(28:56) And so this is another case of your doctor having this information. And you can blame the doctor. It's easy. You can say, oh, the doctor recommended it. But the amazing thing is your doctor is under supervision. And so this is a study from 1990 to 1995. Prevalence and duration of postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy use in a managed care organization from 1990 to 1995. Remember, in 1997, it was found out that hormone replacement was deadly and caused breast cancer. But this study was done in 1990 to 1995.

(29:59) Why was this study done? The study was done to determine the prevalence and duration of postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy use and identify correlates of adherence to therapy. So the study is actually done to find out ways to get more women to take hormone replacement therapy. And since it was done by a managed care organization, it's done by an organization that hires doctors. And its goal was to get these doctors to prescribe more hormone replacement therapy. And so your doctor is also up against the standard of care. What does this mean? This means that he has a lot of rules he has to adhere to. And these rules may not be in your best interest.

(30:43) And so really, you have to actually go and look up the information and do the research yourself, because your doctor is not a free agent who is free to give you information to the best of his knowledge. And that puts you, if you're going to go see a doctor or accept a prescription or recommendation, in a position of really making your own decisions and looking out for yourself, because your doctor is not in a position to do that.

(31:24) So what's my opinion on hormone replacement therapy? Well, I can sit here and say to you, I have never ever taken a hormone pill or a hormone shot of any kind, whether birth control pill or hormone replacement therapy. So I think each person has to make their own decision. Now, one thing a lot of people might say, well, Dr. Daniels, I use bio-identical hormones, natural hormones. Interesting.

(31:58) So let's just take a look at, well, first of all, you need to understand there's only one source of these hormones. So we're talking about estrogen, progesterone, and we'll throw you guys in a mix, testosterone. There are exclusively only animal sources of these. There are in nature, nature does not produce any of these in a plant. So the only place to get these would be harvesting them from other human beings, if we're talking about natural sources.

(32:31) So let's take a look at how your natural progesterone is made. Well, first of all, let's take a look at the definition of natural. So we're on the same page here. So natural means it's existing in or caused by nature, not made or caused by humankind. Okay. Got it. So let's read about how plastics are made. So we'll give an example of something that is clearly not natural, plastics.

(32:58) Plastics are made from natural materials, such as cellulose, that'd be plant matter, coal, natural gas, salt, and crude oil. And then they go on to details of the process. Okay. So how is progesterone made? And this is a sample of... Hold on. This is bio-identical progesterone, identical to humans. And this is what they say. Progesterone is synthesized. That means it's made by man. From a starting material, from a plant source, and it's chemically identical to progesterone of human ovarian origin. So in other words, these hormones are as natural as plastic. They get some plant material from nature, and they synthesize this material from it.

(34:02) So bio-identical hormones are basically a marketing triumph in getting people to perceive something which is clearly artificial, as desirable, as natural, and even as safe. And so present level of research indicates that the bio-identical hormones are as safe or unsafe, however you look at it, as the estrogens and progestins. So bio-identical does not mean safe at all. And I personally don't recommend them. And one could expect the same outcome in terms of breast cancer risk.

(34:47) So that brings us, oh wait, we almost forgot, almost forgot, gotta take our turpentine with sugar. Here we have sugar. There's the sugar. I have my little bottle of turpentine as a dropper, makes it convenient. And you see the sugar turns gray as the turpentine hits it. All right, that's it. Enough of that. So Dr. Duran, how much do you take? I take about half a teaspoon. All right, down the hatch, that's the end of that one.

(35:54) Then we have to take our Shilajit. Shilajit, gooey black tar. I have my little stick, especially for the occasion. There we go. And that's Shilajit. I'm going to put that in our glass. I'm going to answer some questions, and at the end of our questions, we're going to drink that.

(36:39) Dr. Duran, why do you take Shilajit? I take Shilajit because it's a very rich trace mineral source, naturally occurring, dug out the mountains of Russia, and it provides trace minerals or replenishes in my body, so that the enzyme my body naturally makes will work a lot better.

(36:51) All right, so what we want to do now is look at some questions.

(36:58) I have been hunting high and low for cow feet here in Australia, just to find out that they are all soaked in chlorine at the abattoirs, and so are too toxic to consume. So the abattoir, for those of you who don't know, is where animals are killed, or the slaughterhouse. This is a government matter, so doubt it will ever change. So I just bought an instant pot, which costs a lot from the U.S. to cook these. Can you tell me what would be the next best thing to make a soup with?

(37:24) It would be pig's feet. So pig's feet, and next after that would be chicken feet. I'm 64 years old and want it for joints and collagen. Yes, in that case, the pig's feet would be your next bet. Ham hocks are also good. I haven't had meat for 25 years, and so I'm trying to wean myself back into this after listening to Dr. Daniels for many years now.

(37:55) All right, great. Take it slow, no big rush, but you'll feel a difference. You'll feel a lot stronger, a lot more energy.

(38:02) My friend has a lot of pain inside his nose. His nose is inflamed, no open sores. He has a headache too. This has happened a few times over the last few months. What do you think might be going on and how can he relieve the pain and cure for his nasal and sinuses?

(38:17) Okay. So we've got nose pain and we've got headaches. This is a common side effect of dairy intake. Yep, yep, yep. Dairy does it. Alcohol can do it, any kind of dairy. So it could be yogurt, ice cream, cheese. So headaches are generally caused by toxins in the blood and really not enough water. So this person should take their body weight, divide it by 50, and drink that number of quarts of water every day. And they will notice the headaches will go away and they will not get any more headaches and also stop the dairy.

(38:53) Now for the nose, the simplest thing to do for that is to take Vicks VapoRub, put it on your index finger, and just swipe it on the lower nostrils. And then as you breathe, as you inhale it, it'll actually heal the whole nasal area.

(39:13) Is it safe to take vitality capsules with a fatty liver? Yes, it is.

(39:19) Now, we're not going to be able to answer all of these questions today. So I just want to let people know that appointments are available at vitalitycapsules.com forward slash appointment. That's vitalitycapsules.com forward slash appointment.

(39:38) Hi, Dr. Daniels. My friend has osteoarthritis of her hip. She is in great pain, which interferes with her life. Her only option, as doctors suggested, was joint replacement surgery, which she doesn't want to do. What are her other options?

(39:53) Okay, so the thing to know about joint replacement surgery, especially at the hip, is it does not always take the pain away, number one. And number two, even when it does take the pain away, the pain generally comes back because when they replace the joint, they glue the new joint to the existing bone, which of course is weak. And as that bone deteriorates, the new replacement gets a little loose and the pain comes right back.

(40:30) So what's a lady to do? So we're talking about the hip joint, which is a pretty big joint. So your better bet would be cow feet if you can get them, ham hocks, which would help with the hip, and believe it or not, pig ears. So pig ears have a ton of cartilage in them that will help rebuild the cartilage in her hip. In any of these things, you just basically boil them and add some salt, bay leaf, and garlic, and eat them over rice with a cooked vegetable. But I would recommend cow feet, pig feet, ham hocks, something in that area. Those would be very strong collagen sources.

(41:14) What would you suggest for brain parasites and natural treatments? Well, brain parasites, important thing to understand is they are not just in your brain. So if you have parasites in your brain, then these parasites are also in your blood, in your liver, and in your intestines. And the reason you perceive them in your brain or you're having brain symptoms is because they can't get out. And so you have to help them out. The way you help them out is by pooping three times a day. And that's the reason I made vitality capsules. You can get those at vitalitycapsules.com. But you must poop three times a day. That's easy.

(41:55) The next thing is also at vitalitycapsules.com is the Candida Cleaner Report. And that will help you follow a diet where you will no longer put in more parasites and you no longer put in the parasite's favorite food. When the parasites don't have their favorite food and you're pooping three times a day, they decide we are in the wrong place. We need to leave. And they will actually voluntarily leave your body. Very, very nice.

(42:20) So once you're pooping three times a day and you have changed your diet and you got a good flow to the toilet, then, and only then, you can put castor oil on your scalp. And it actually soaks in and it mobilizes and loosens the parasites. You must wait until you're pooping three times a day, you're well hydrated, you've changed your diet before you do that because obviously you don't want the parasites just relocating to another part of the brain or another part of the body. You want them out. And when you put the castor oil on your head or on your scalp, be very generous and then put a shower cap on. You can sleep with a shower cap.

(43:04) My husband was found with a blood clot in his lungs, and doctors don't know why. The only medical condition he has prior to this was asthma. Any thoughts?

(43:20) Yes. So blood clots generally are caused by just a kind of perfect storm of a few factors. One factor is dehydration, not enough water. Another factor is sitting still, like maybe he has a sedentary job or maybe he took an airplane flight or a train ride or a long car ride or something like that. So sedentary, dehydration, and then I refer to it as junk food, but eating a diet with additives and chemicals in it that will tend to clump and clot. So those are the three things that go together and boom, you get a blood clot. So you now have the blood clot, what do we do?

(44:00) First thing is to hydrate or just simply, really the simplest thing. Just go to vitalitycapsules.com, download the Candida Cleaner Report, and that gives you instructions on hydration and diet. Okay, got it. So we got that. He's at least got that going.

(44:28) The next thing is he needs to give his lungs some exercise by breathing deeply and slowly. Expand his lungs and get more blood to his lungs and get the blood circulating through his lungs.

(44:44) Then finally, the herbal approach would be a tablespoon of cayenne pepper, 90 heat units is a good strength, and one quarter cup of apple cider vinegar, shake it up, and take about a teaspoon every hour while awake. It takes about three days and dissolves the blood clot and he'll know the blood clot's all because he'll breathe so much better. Now, this is not compatible with blood thinners. He's going to have to make up his mind.

(45:10) So there you have it. Now, obviously, this is not medical advice. They don't teach this in medical school. So this is for your information only and use it however you wish.

(45:31) I've been suffering from TMJ, that's temporomandibular joint disease. And so for those of you who may not be familiar, it's the joint, it's your ear, it's right in front of your ear. And if you open your mouth, yeah, you'll feel it. And that's the joint we're talking about. And so suffering means this person's in pain. Whiplash, that means maybe a car accident, just guessing. Gone to chiropractor, acupuncture, and both helped a bit, but it's back. There's a squeezy noise every time I eat. What do you recommend I do?

(46:00) So what's really going on is this joint is deteriorating. And when you went to the chiropractor, all he did was move it a little bit to take the pressure off that joint. And when you went to the acupuncture, he moved energy from a stronger part of your body to that joint. And that is always temporary if you have an overall energy deficit, which apparently you have. So what you need to do is eat some bone broth, pretty strong bone broth, or probably the best thing would be maybe chicken feet. And that way your body will have the building blocks it needs to fix that joint and get rid of the squeezy noise. And you'll see the joint will work better, you won't have pain, and you won't have that terrible noise.

(47:08) Okay, I contracted what is supposedly Scandinavian scabies about 14 years ago. I get bleeding sores that keep coming up. I'm exhausted with fighting this cursed health problem. Can you help me? Please, I need a cure. I feel quite suicidal.

(47:26) All right, so if you haven't killed yourself yet, then you're in luck. So whenever you have a skin condition called bleeding sores that keeps coming up, the real problem is not the infection. The real problem is your skin is not regenerating or healing fast enough. And so what you need is a good source of skin. My favorite is pig cheek or pig jowl, and you have to get it with the skin on it. And that skin will replace and repair your skin and will heal it up.

(48:12) The only thing you've got to do is you need some kind of coating to put on your skin. And that would be, my recommendation would be castor oil. So apply castor oil from the waist down for three days and then head to toe. And then go to vitalitycouncils.com, download the Candida Cleaner Report, follow the diet, except add the pig cheeks to it. And then once you get to where you're pooping three times a day and you're well hydrated, then you can start turpentine and that will route out the little animals that are

(48:39) driving you crazy. All right, let's see what else we have.

(49:06) Can turpentine help me with about 20% of a functioning aortic valve? It is what the medicine men call calcified, but my chiropractor says oxidized. All right, so it just makes you feel better. Calcified and oxidized, same thing. I don't want open-heart surgery. I don't want to give my life to the system and drugs. I am 68, female, and have a strong heart.

(49:32) Okay, so turpentine actually does help with calcification. And I've seen many cases where it's reversed calcification. So you could just go to vitalitycapsules.com, download the Candida Cleaner Report, and follow the instructions there. And that would be very helpful.

(49:56) All right, amazing. Now it's not possible to answer all questions, and a lot of questions aren't really appropriate for this format because the information provided is not adequate. And it's only one, you know, it's only one show. It's not a series of shows.

(50:17) All righty, so what can you do? You can get an appointment at vitalitycapsules.com forward slash appointment.

(50:23) All right, oh wait, almost forgot. Okay, so this is our Shilajit. Let's just stir this up. How colorful is that? There you go. Down the hatch. Turpentine, done. Shilajit, done.

(50:59) All right, we'll see you again next week. And until then, think happens.